On this page.... RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF
# Thursday, 22 June 2006
Come see .NET guru Bill Wolff tonight as he presents on SQL Reporting Services for the central New Jersey user group!

Time:
6:15 - 6:30pm - Pizza
6:30 - 6:45pm - Intro, Announcements
6:45 - 8:15pm - Main Speaker
8:15 - 8:30pm - Raffle

For Directions

Check out NJ.NET for more info and to sign up for future meeting notices.

Spread the word!  I'll see you tonight!
Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:15:24 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, 19 June 2006

Is anyone else as frustrated as I am with the multifarious password policies you run into across systems?  It seems like everyone and his brother has "the best" idea of what a strong password should be, which translates into having to keep up with N passwords and which systems they map to. 

That's bad enough, but then you have these people who think that making you change your password every N days is a good idea and that you can't use the last N passwords you've already used.  To make it worse, some brilliant minds out there think that forcing us to have "strong" usernames is a good idea too, so you end up with something like N^N permutations of usernames and passwords that you have to track. 

"So what?" you say.  "We've got a nifty 'Forgot Password' option on our site/app/etc.." 

But I have to ask, is that really ideal?  Perhaps if we didn't have to keep track of N^N passwords mapped in matrices to the N! systems we use, we wouldn't forget them so often! 

I'm not saying that having strong passwords is a bad idea, not at all.  I'm suggesting that we all work toward agreeing on what a strong password is and come up with, dare I suggest, standards based on data sensitivity.  So for instance, here are some ideas:

  1. If all you've got for a particular system is generic profile data, that would require a very low strength password, say minimum six characters, no special chars or numbers required. 
  2. Then you might have a next level for systems that keep your order history (but no financial data per se).  These kinds of systems might require eight characters with at least one number.
  3. You might then have systems that store financial data, such as credit cards, but are still a commerce system; these could require eight characters with at least one number and one special character.
  4. Then there are the actual banking, trading, etc. systems, and these might require ten characters with at least one number and special character.
  5. For systems above this level (e.g., company VPN), you would want to have some kind of dual authentication with a strong password and RSA tag, smart card, bio, etc.

Anyways, the point is not necessarily that these are the best specific guidelines; I don't consider myself a security expert, but I know enough to understand that what we have going on is not likely adding to our general security because in order to keep track of all these authentication tokens, we have to write them down somewhere, store them in some vault, file, sticky pad, etc., which in the end likely makes our security less, and it certainly adds to both individual and organizational administration overhead to manage password resets, fetches, etc.

If we had standards like I'm suggesting that were well published, then every Joe that goes to write a new system would easily be able to put in place a policy that is both secure, appropriate for the data being protected, and manageable for everyone involved.  If we only had maybe four passwords to remember, even if they're odd and funky (with special characters and numbers) or if they were pass phrases, we would have to write them down or forget them or manage getting them reset all the time.  In other words, we'd be more secure and happier.  And if we do have such standards, they need to be far more publicized and talked about when the subject comes up because I've not heard of them, and I don't think I live in the proverbial cave.

Monday, 19 June 2006 13:53:29 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
# Sunday, 18 June 2006

I just finally got Windows Vista up and running on my DFI LANPARTY SLI-DR board (has nVidia's nForce4 chipset).  Plugged into that are an AMD Athlon Dual Core X2 3800+ chip, 2 GB RAM, 2 Western Digital 36.7 GB 10K SATA (setup as RAID 0), and an nVidia GeForce 6600 GT (not running SLI yet), among other less important peripherals. 

It wasn't easy getting this going.  nVidia has 64 bit Vista drivers for its chipset, but they're incomplete and the instructions they post on their site don't work for me (and others).  Thankfully, someone else has put together an install guide, but even with that, it took me two tries to get it going (it didn't like my USB drive the first time apparently). 

The silly thing is that Vista B2 won't ask me for my drivers before it summarily decides that it can't find any information about my disks, so you have to start from an existing XP installation and run the installer from there and install on a secondary partition.  I hope they get this resolved by release because I'd really like to repartition my drives and install it on my C drive.  Maybe my blogging this with my specs will help others who are in a similar situation.

Anyways, it's up and running and it is pretty nifty so far.  I'm one to go in for eye candy, and I love the new Flip3D and Glass (about all I've really had a chance to play with thus far).  I can say it is a bit annoying that when it prompts you to run something as admin that the whole screen blanks out; don't know what that's all about.  Maybe it's intentional just to ensure they have your attention...

One thing I can't seem to get working now is the gadgets.  I show the sidebar and it is just blank.  When I try to add gadgets, nothing happens.  Will google more for the answer...

Sunday, 18 June 2006 23:33:23 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, 15 June 2006

I guess somebody thought it'd be a lot of fun to see a bunch of geeks take an early morning stroll. 

I was rudely awakened not long ago by what seemed to be an alarm clock, my neighbor's alarm clock, or so it seemed in my groggy, post-party sleeping mind.  So I tossed the useless, decorative pillow towards the noise, hoping somehow that'd make a difference.  It wasn't until the recorded voice came on telling me that it was an emergency that it crossed my mind that I might want to get up and see what the hell was going on. 

I jumped up or, more actually probably, crawled out of bed and tossed enough clothes on as to not scare my cohabitors and stepped out into the hallway.  Most folks seemed to be in the same mind-numbed state as I because we all slowly and calmly trapsed towards the stairs, greeting each other with friendly and somehow knowing smiles.

The stairs took an uncomfortably long time to descend.  All the while I was thinking about how it's a good thing that it wasn't a real emergency; otherwise, well, err, umm, our studied rate of descent would not I think have sufficed.

After stepping down uncounted steps, we broke through the perimeter and exited the rear of the building.  It could have been a scene from Night of the Living Dead for all the energe with which we circled the building, looking inquisitively at each other and the seemingly unharmed hotel.

Eventually, I came to a stop at what I thought was a safe distance when the hotel started to disassemble itself, floor by floor, starting at the top down, like a drunk man shedding his clothes to join a swimming party.

No.. wait... that was just my sleep-deprived imagination trying to make sense of the events.  What actually happened was that I waited and chatted with a fella that I probably otherwise would not have met until we saw folks start slowly streaming back into the hotel, past the fire trucks and ambulances (yes, those were real, surely).  We stumbled into the lobby as a few of Boston's finest meaningfully slid past us, carrying what little gear they brought in with them.

Now, after my legs quit burning from the strenuous ascent back up seven floors (hey, I'm not in good shape!), I find the alluring siren call of the bed beckoning me to return to the dreamland whence I came before this brief morning adventure was so rudely thrust upon me.

As the good Willy Wonka once said, "adieu. auf wiedersehen.  gesundheit. farewell.  parting is such sweet sorrow..."

Thursday, 15 June 2006 04:22:29 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, 14 June 2006

If you're reading this and you attended my session on Monday morning at 9a but haven't yet filled out an evaluation, please do so.  I've been told the room seats over 800 and it was packed, but only 208 thus far have submitted evals.  I'd really like to know what EVERYONE thought, not just those few who've filled it out thus far.  It only takes a minute, and you get a chance to win an XBox if you do it sooner rather than later. 

Info again: 6/12/2006 - 9:00-10:15, WEB301 - Accelerating Web Development with Enterprise Library.

Just go to: http://msteched.com, log in, and go to fill out evals for breakouts (menu on left).

And remember, be honest but kind!  :-p

Wednesday, 14 June 2006 17:32:30 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Monday, 05 June 2006

As most of you know who follow my blog at all, I recently joined Infragistics.  Well, I finally got around to getting my company blog set up, so if you're curious or interested, feel free to check it out and maybe subscribe.  While you're there, if you are a customer or potential customer, you might want to look around at the other blogs and maybe subscribe to some of them to stay on top of Infragistics stuff.

Monday, 05 June 2006 11:16:05 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Sunday, 04 June 2006

It's been on my mind for some time to (re)try my hand at fiction again.  I've got some experience, chiefly from my university days, but I've been feeling the urge to stretch those fictional writing muscles again.  Now that I've got some publisher contacts, I thought it might be worth pursuing.  Granted, they're tech publishers, but at least some of them work at houses with fiction publishing arms.  Maybe they could hook me up.

Then again, I thought that rather than committing myself to a book project with a publisher up front, I might try a different approach akin to the serials in the old days.  In essence, I thought I might set up a site for the book and publish chapters one at a time on the site, using RSS as the notification mechanism for when new chapters are available.  For those who don't mind reading online and waiting for the next chapter, I figure they could use the site and give me feedback as the book progresses.  Then, once I have something that might qualify as a book, I could see if any publisher would have me for those who (like me) still prefer to read from paper pages.

So what do you think of an approach like that?  Would you ever read a book published serially on a web site?

Sunday, 04 June 2006 20:46:55 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 

I ran into an odd problem the other day that I figured I'd blog for any other poor souls stricken with the same enigma.  Without going into the details of why I was trying to setup the indexing service on my Windows XP SP2 box, I found that when I tried to get into it from MMC (Computer Management), it would give me an error when I tried to expand the Services and Applications node saying that it failed to initialize the snap-in for the indexing service.

Searching on various combinations of the error message really didn't help, on Google or MS.  Everything appeared to be in order (the service acted like it was running) except that it wouldn't run the snap-in, and when I looked at the Windows Components tab in Add/Remove Programs, it showed that Indexing Service was unchecked.  Even if I checked it and clicked next (at which point it'd act like it was installing and configuring it, it would still show up as unchecked.

I had also noticed in recent days that I'd occasionally get one of those application crashed, do you want to debug messages about this SearchFilterHost.exe app.  When I first got the message, nothing came up for it on Google.  When I searched again on Friday, I found a few indicating that it was part of Office 2007 Beta 2, which I've been running since the day it was released, more or less.  I had kind of assumed that, but I just ignored the error and moved on.

Well, those two things gelled in my mind to suggest that maybe it was something with Office 2007 Beta 2 that was hosing up the Indexing Service.  More specifically, I suspected it had to do with the Windows Desktop Search that Outlook and OneNote 2007 prompt you to install.  On this hunch, I uninstalled the desktop search, and voila, my Indexing Service snap-in worked again, as did the program I was running that wanted to use it.

So the moral is that if you're having odd issues with Indexing Service, this is one thing you'll want to try.  It worked for me.  Now, I wish I could run the desktop search to optimize searching in Office.  I logged a bug on the beta site, but I figure my problem is probably just odd enough as to not be reproducible. :)  We'll see...

Sunday, 04 June 2006 20:40:25 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [9]  | 
# Friday, 02 June 2006

I recently ordered an audiobook on CD from Recorded Books, mainly because it was only available there from what I could find.  The book is Baudolino (great medieval fiction, BTW; I’ve listened to it from libraries 2x already).  Anyways, I was suprised when they charged me sales tax because they’re based in MD not NJ, so I wrote to ask them about it.  This is their response:

The state of New Jersey Department of Revenue now requires Recorded Books to collect sales tax on orders from residents of New Jersey.  They base the demand on the fact that outstanding rental audiobooks (in the hands of New Jersey residents) gives Recorded Books a "physical presence" in the State and therefore we are compelled by law to collect sales tax on all orders from New Jersey.

Before I moved up here, I knew that property taxes were high and that they have state income tax (unlike Florida), but since I’ve been here, I’ve heard other amazing stories about the ridiculous ways in which the state taxes its residents.  This has got to be one of the more creative ones, though.  They sure are creative bloodsuckers; I’ll give them that!

Friday, 02 June 2006 12:49:25 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
# Tuesday, 30 May 2006

I just ran across a rather interesting article while doing some book research for my upcoming book, The Contemporary Patriarch.  Of course, I'm kidding about the book; Mrs. dotNetTemplar has, tongue in cheek, suggested I write it a few times if for no other reason than that I might get an interview on The Colbert Report.

So, I was doing some searching to see what the competition is for my book, and I came across this article, which just happens to be on a site that appears to be about Catholic culture.  The excerpt is from something written by Christopher Dawson in 1933.  Remarkably, most of it is still quite relevant.  The only thing that seemed obviously dated, sadly, is the claim that "marriage is still the only form of sexual union which is openly tolerated by society."  Other than that it is an interesting read that considers the impact of marrital structures on broader society through history.  I recommend it.

In a related note, I found this quote quite telling (from this article on Newsweek):  "All my friends are having kids," says Penny Stohn, 33, a director for the New Jersey Department of Higher Education."They tell me how glamorous my life is but I just sit there and envy them their kids."  I find the frank admittance of the value of marriage and the family by career-minded, single women quite notable given what still seems to be the popular sentiment about full-time wives and mothers, which is that it is still somewhat looked down upon.  Motherhood is, to the contrary, probably the most intrinsically valuable career a person could have, and these single women attest that this is still the unspoken truth.

Tuesday, 30 May 2006 21:05:34 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, 25 May 2006

I'm not usually one to bring my political views to bear, chiefly because they have changed a lot over the last 10 years. In some ways, I could sympathize with Kerry in his being labeled a flip-flopper simply because I try to have an open mind, see issues from as many sides as are presented to me, and try to choose what seems to be the most viable given the current data and my presuppositions. I'm not one to doggedly cling to an idea just because it is the one I previously selected as my own (or at least I try not to); if new data is presented or new arguments that make an alternative seem to be better, I'm not so intellectually inert that I won't ever change.

Unfortunately, I guess that approach to life can make one a flip-flopper, but I’d say in that respect, being a flip-flopper is a good thing to be.  Changing my views (or at least my professed views) based on popular winds of opinion or the advice of my campaign managers, however, is not a good reason to be a flip-flopper, and that’s where Kerry and I differed, or so it seemed to me.

All that said, I find myself wanting to say something about this post over on the Future of Freedom Foundation.  Personally, thanks to a very persistent Libertarian boss I once had, I’ve flirted with Libertarianism.  It certainly has its appeal, especially in this relativistic age.  I think Mr. Hornberger, though, is painting conservatives with too broad a brush (what else is new?).  In that vein, I’d say that we can sum up Libertarianism with the old dictum of “live and let live.”  It takes freedom to an extreme, such that it becomes the core tenet of their political creed.  

Unfortunately, it leaves out the central good of government, which is to promote the common good.  Certainly freedom is one of the chief goods that we have as humans, but it is not the only one.  It seems to me that government must also take action to promote the common good, which includes other goods such as public decency, protection of innocents, affordable transportation, and care for the poor, to name a few.  And it is precisely in these other areas that the Libertarian and I differ. 

While they might agree that these are common goods, they would argue (or have with me at least) that all these can and should be promoted through private organizations and peer pressure, not the government.  But as I see it, such an argument is flawed in that government, in a very basic sense, is just such a social organization, particularly a democratic republic such as our own.  Libertarians speak of taxes being akin to stealing and government being the modern day Robin Hood, but that would only be true if we were governed by a non-representative government.  It is this point, in fact, that catalyzed our founders to form this new republic.

As I see it, Libertarianism is the rich person’s religion.  It shares many similarities with feudalism.  In fact, if Libertarianism were fully applied today, I think we’d see just such a social structure emerge—those who can afford to fund their liberties would have them; the rest of us would have to attach ourselves to one such lord or another in order to ensure, as much as is possible under such a social organization, some subset of the liberties we have today.  Maybe the lords would be corporations, maybe they’d be individuals, but when you privatize every common good that is provided by government, that’s what you end up with.

It is, in fact, Libertarianisms failure to account for the common good that I find myself unable to attach myself to that party, despite its superficial appeal.  Of course, I don’t find myself able to attach myself to any of the current parties in our system, which is why I’m registered as an Independent.  Each of the parties have compellingly good platforms on different things, but none fully aligns with what seems to me to be the best approach to government.  Sadly, our mostly bipartisan system is just woefully inadequate.  And painting folks with broad brushes such as conservatives and liberals just doesn’t work; somehow I just don’t think I’m alone in feeling this way.

Thursday, 25 May 2006 09:00:09 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are solely my own personal opinions, founded or unfounded, rational or not, and you can quote me on that.

Thanks to the good folks at dasBlog!

Copyright © 2017 J. Ambrose Little